1. Yet, in genealogy, everyone knowthat per rule discover an exclusion. Good vexing part ofgenealogy is the fact no-one extremely understands how to utilize the brand new conditions orrules with any decisive adjective such as constantly, maybe, probably,almost certainly, an such like. It will be interesting in the event the truth be told there most other examples ofjointures getting generated annually or a few after a well-known matrimony big date.
dos. Could there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation toward relationship off ElizabethClifford and you will Sir Ralph Bowes who had been 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise next cousins, immediately after taken out of the brand new fifth LordClifford? That would restrict its marriage go out Estniska kvinnor dejta.
Arthur
Presumably, in the event that a dispensation is desired and offered, it can havebeen because of the one of the following the, that will can be found in the correspondingregister guide, when it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop regarding Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out-of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop out of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. When your 10th Lord Clifford does wed in early 1487 [state January] andhas E after where seasons, really does the fresh chronology perhaps not work?
John palms?
Age created inside later 1487, Henry produced inside the 1488/nine, Joan in the ,etcetera. filling out the labels of upload off . If the (a) thechronology still work; and (b) her wedding portion was not low; thenwe have only the 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s which is from inside the oppositionto the new conjecture one to she was a legitimate daughter.
6. Regarding your 1505 pedigree: Will be the Clifford daughters the fresh onlyknown Henry VII affairs omitted? Have there been others? Therefore,would not that reflect defectively about this document because a resource?
Off reviews I have made from new c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith the brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of North pedigrees, that are
In the c.1505 Relations pedigrees, the new Clifford children are maybe not listedin a Clifford pedigree, but rather regarding St. John pedigree. Due to the fact I’mnot accustomed the new St. John family, following the ’s the pointers asit looks throughout the c.1505 pedigree, due to the fact obtained from this new 1834 Coll. Finest. etGen. post. This new phrasing in the quotations is strictly because it appears inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).
„No. XII.“Away from my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.“f.288, 296, 317, 318.“Margaret Duchess of Somerset got three husbands.“ Of the „John Duke ofSomerset“ she got „My Lady the newest King’s Mom.“ who’d „The latest King.“ whohad „Prince „Of the „Sir Oliver Saint John, first spouse.“ she had step three daus & dos sons:
A good. „Edith, wedded so you can Geoffrey Pole out of Buckinghamshire.“ They’d:A1. „Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married on the Woman Margaret, dau. from theDuke away from Clarence.“ They’d: „Harry. „A2. „Alianor, married to Ralph Verney, Esq.“ That they had: „John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a different sort of child, unnamed].“
B. „John Ssint John, esq.“ He’d four pupils:B1. „Sir John Saint John, Knight.“ who’d „Four daughters and you will oneson.“B2. „Anne, wedd. so you can Harry Lord Clifford.“ They had „Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.“B3. „E, wedded so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. away from Lincolnshire.“B4. „A great Nun out of Shaftesbury.“B5. „Oliver Saint John.“
C. „Dame Mary, married so you can Sir Richard Frognall.“ That they had:C1. „Edmond Frognall with his brethren and you will sistren.“ Which have issueindicated, however titled.C2. „Elizabeth, wedded so you’re able to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.“
D. „Elizabeth, wedded first for the Lord Zouche; shortly after towards the LordScrope of Bolton.“ Issue:D1. [of the Zouche] “ Catesby.“ They’d:“Age. George. John. William.“D2. [of the Scrope] “ Conyers.“ Which have issueindicated although not named.
Margaret Duchess from Somerset, by the „Lionel Lord Welles, last husband.“had: „John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. away from K. Edward IV.“ andthey got „Elizabeth.“